Trace a court or interview recording without turning it into a verdict

A hearing or interview is useful only if you can find the exact words later. A narrative memo is easier to read and easier to get wrong.

What the trace lists

Legal / Court Record Trace transcribes the recording, keeps speaker turns, and lists statements, questions, objections, spoken rulings, exhibit mentions, and numbers with times. If two lines by the same speaker appear inconsistent, it flags them for review. It does not say anyone is lying.

This is a trace of the recording, not legal advice, not a verdict, and not a claim that anything is admissible.

Who it is for

Lawyers, investigators, and teams reviewing a recorded proceeding they are allowed to have. It is not a consumer “win your case” product.

How to use an inconsistency flag

Play both clips. A flag can be a clarification, a transcript error, or a real change. Write your own note. Do not paste the flag into a filing as if the tool made a finding.

For a business call that is not a proceeding, Promise ledger and Two-recording comparison are the narrower tools.

Limitations

Overlapping objections and poor room mics will thin the transcript. Exhibit numbers said quickly will be wrong sometimes. The tool will not decide guilt, innocence, credibility, or admissibility.

Medical visits belong on Medical Conversation Trace. Do not run a clinical file through a court workflow to make it look more official.

Keep your own archive of the original. This site is not a court repository.